Duplex Sonographic Protocol for establishment of reference luminal diameters and intima-media thickness of Carotid Arteries in a West African Population

Authors

  • Kpuduwei SPK Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Author
  • Kiridi EK Niger Delta University image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

Duplex scan protocol, Carotid artery, Luminal diameter, Intima-media thickness, West African population

Abstract

Duplex sonography is the primary imaging modality for carotid artery disease, but its accuracy depends on a standardized protocol and population-specific reference values, which are lacking for West Africa. We describe a detailed sonographic protocol applied to a cohort of 104 healthy Nigerian adults. Using a 7.0 MHz linear transducer, the luminal diameters of the common, internal, and external carotid arteries were measured in end-diastole, 1 cm from the bifurcation. The study presents a step-by-step imaging protocol that is feasible in a resource-limited setting. The resulting reference ranges for carotid luminal diameters are: Common Carotid Artery: 0.45-0.76 cm, Internal Carotid Artery: 0.44-0.75 cm, and External Carotid Artery: 0.30-0.67 cm. These values were consistent across sexes and sides. We provide a standardized, reproducible duplex sonography protocol and the first set of normative reference values for carotid luminal diameters in a West African population. This resource will aid sonographers and clinicians in improving the accuracy and reliability of carotid ultrasound examinations in the region.

Author Biographies

  • Kpuduwei SPK, Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa,

    Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

  • Kiridi EK, Niger Delta University

    Department of Radiology, Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria & Department of Radiology, Niger Delta University, Amasoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

References

1. The AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Extracranial Cerebrovascular System. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2022 Apr 1;41(4):E21–7. doi:10.1002/jum.15877

2. JSUM. J Med Ultrasonics [Internet]. 2009 [Accessed 2026 Mar 21]. Standard method for ultrasound evaluation of carotid artery lesions. Available from: https://www.jsum.or.jp/uploads_files/english/carotid_artery.pdf

3. Sebastian SA, Co EL, Tidd-Johnson A, Chowdhury S, Jain E, Davidson M, et al. Usefulness of Carotid Ultrasound Screening in Primary Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jan 1;49(1):102147. doi:10.1016/J.CPCARDIOL.2023.102147 PubMed PMID: 37863454.

4. Mukabagorora T, Mbonambi L, Lockhat Z, Musafiri A, Kekana RM. A comprehensive scoping review of existing carotid duplex ultrasound scanning and reporting protocols: identifying gaps and opportunities for standardization of practice in low-income countries. Journal of Ultrasound 2025 28:4. 2025 Aug 28;28(4):783–801. doi:10.1007/S40477-025-01064-1 PubMed PMID: 40866737.

5. Oddone EZ, Horner RD, Sloane R, McIntyre L, Ward A, Whittle J, et al. Race, Presenting Signs and Symptoms, Use of Carotid Artery Imaging, and Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1350–6.

6. Zhang Y, Guallar E, Malhotra S, Astor BC, Polak JF, Qiao Y, et al. Carotid Artery Wall Thickness and Incident Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison between US and MRI in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Radiology. 2018 Dec 1;289(3):649–57. doi:10.1148/RADIOL.2018173069 PubMed PMID: 30299234.

7. Creagh S, Ortiz A, Fumero J, Paydar A. Impact of MRI Characterization of the Carotid Artery in the Understanding of Stroke. Vol. 6. 2017;6(2). doi:10.4172/2167-7964.1000255

8. Peper ES, Strijkers GJ, Gazzola K, Potters W V., Motaal AG, Luirink IK, et al. Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2018 Dec 20;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12968-018-0499-y PubMed PMID: 30567566.

9. Koskinen, S. M., Soinne, L., Valanne, L., & Silvennoinen H. The normal internal carotid artery: a CTA study. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(9):723–9.

10. Tolezani EC, Costa-Hong V, Correia G, Mansur AJ, Drager LF, Bortolotto LA. Determinants of functional and structural properties of large arteries in healthy individuals. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Nov 1;103(5):426–32. doi:10.5935/abc.20140124

11. Alastruey J. Numerical assessment of time-domain methods for the estimation of local arterial pulse wave speed. J Biomechanics. 2010;44(2011):885–891.

12. Jmor S, Griffin M, Tegos T, Danjhl S, Nicolaides A. Grading Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Using B-mode Ultrasound ( In Vivo Study ). Vol. 322. 1999;322:315–22.

13. Gasparyan AY. The Use of Carotid Artery Ultrasonography in Different Clinical Conditions. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2009 Jul 13;3(1):78. doi:10.2174/1874192400903010078 PubMed PMID: 19606232.

14. Oglat AA, Matjafri MZ, Suardi N, Oqlat MA, Abdelrahman MA, Oqlat AA. A Review of Medical Doppler Ultrasonography of Blood Flow in General and Especially in Common Carotid Artery. J Med Ultrasound. 2018 Jan 1;26(1):3–13. doi:10.4103/JMU.JMU_11_17 PubMed PMID: 30065507.

15. Rockman CB, Hoang H, Guo Y, Maldonado TS. The prevalence of carotid artery stenosis varies signi fi cantly by race. J Vasc Surg. 57(2):327–37. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.118

16. WMA. The World Medical Association [Internet]. 1964 [cited 2026 Jun 13]. Declaration of Helsinki 1964 . Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/doh-jun1964/

17. Goyal RC. Reseach Methodology for Health Professionals including Proposal, Thesis and Article Writting. Jaypee Brothers' Medical publishers Ltd; 2013. 136–140 p.

18. Sullivan L. Boston Univeristy School of Public Health [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2026 Jun 13]. p. 1–23. Issues in Estimating Sample Size for Confidence Intervals Estimates. Available from: http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules

19. Agunloye AM, Owolabi MO. Exploring Carotid Sonographic Parameters Associated With Stroke Risk Among Hypertensive Stroke Patients Compared to Hypertensive Controls. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014;33(6):975–83. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.6.975 PubMed PMID: 24866604.

20. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, Charles SM, Fail T, Humphries K, et al. Joint Recommendations for Reporting Carotid Ultrasound Investigations in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery. 2009;37(3):251–61. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015

21. Roman MJ, Naqvi TZ, Gardin JM, Gerhard-Herman M, Jaff M, Emile Mohler. American Association Echocardiographers- Clinical-App-of-Noninvasive-Vasc-US-in-CV-Risk-Stratification.pdf. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:943–54.

22. BMUS. Guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound equipment Part I: Basic guidelines. The British Medical Ultrasound Society. [Internet]. 2009 Jul [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: www.bmus.org

23. Choi HY. Carotid duplex ultrasound: interpretations and clinical applications. Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Oct 29;23(2):82–91. doi:10.14253/ACN.2021.23.2.82

24. Kpuduwei SPK, Kiridi EK, Fawehinmi HB, Oladipo GS. Reference luminal diameters of the carotid arteries among healthy Nigerian adults. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2022;81(3):579–83. doi:10.5603/FM.a2021.0062 PubMed PMID: 34184750.

25. Kpuduwei SPK, Kiridi EK, Ibegu O, Amasiatu VC. Normative Clinical Reference for Intima-media Thickness of Carotid Arteries among Nigerian Adults. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):1. doi:10.4103/jwas.jwas_88_22 PubMed PMID: 36203921.

Published

2026-06-21